new-top-banner-english

Moses and his cushite wife

Goto the e-book: Moses and his Cushite Wife

We live in the most turbulent times ever.  If we thus talk about the danger of complete obliteration by man of himself as well as all life on earth, it is not scary fiction but hard fact.

 

In his Prophetic Address in Matthew 24:22 our Lord Jesus said:

          “And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.”

 

He spoke about the days in which we are currently living.

We are standing on the brink of the greatest economic collapse the world has ever seen.  The gold price that is now soaring steeply will fall suddenly and then Revelation 18 will be fulfilled.  We read it in the Bible and it is explained “verse by verse” in my book “The Book of Revelation”.

 

One of the other characteristics of this end of ‘The End Times’ is the danger of deception.  I repeat the following verses in:

Matthew 24: 4, 11.

4          And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.

11         And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.

(Please read verse 24 as well)

 

One of the greatest deceptions, especially of our times, is the racial issue.  We are increasingly inundated with information that there is no difference between the races except for colour.  In this context in Numbers 12, reference is made to MOSES AND HIS CUSHITE WIFE.  I request, dear reader, that you read this scripture.

 

Customs in Biblical times:

In Numbers 12:1 Aaron and Miriam began to talk against Moses because of his Cushite wife and in the following verses we read how the wrath of God was kindled against them because they dared to speak against Moses.  It is then accepted without questioning that Moses wife was black due to the fact that she was called a Cushite. 

In Biblical times it was often customary to identify a person according to the country from which he or she came, instead of his racial origin.  Herewith a few examples:

 

Moses:

In Exodus 2:19 Moses is called an Egyptian.

          And they said, An Egyptian delivered us out of the hand of the shepherds, and also drew water enough for us, and watered the flock.

This was the answer that Jethro’s daughters gave, as to why they returned home earlier than usual.  Moses arrive at the well when he was fleeing from Egypt because he had slain an Egyptian.  Although the daughters of Jethro called him an Egyptian, we know that he was not an Egyptian but an Israelite.

 

Jacob:

In Deuteronomy 26:5 Jacob is called a Syrian ( an Aramaean)

5        And thou shalt speak and say before the LORD thy God, A Syrian ready to perish was my father and he went down into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and became there a nation, great, mighty, and populous:

We do however know that Jacob was not an Aramaean (Syrian) but an Israelite (the first Israelite).  They called him Aramaean because he came from Aram to Egypt.

 

Rebekah:

In Genesis 25:20, Rebekah, the daughter of Bethuel, the Syrian of Padan-Aram and also sister of Laban, is called Syrian.  We know that they were not Aramaean but Hebrews as they were descendants of Abraham, the Hebrew.

In Genesis 24:1-4 we read that Abraham made his chief servant swear that he will go to Abraham’s country, to his own relatives there, to bring a wife for Isaac, Abraham’s son.  Bethuel, Laban and Rebekah were thus Hebrews but they were called Aramaean because they lived in Aram where Abraham’s servant travelled to seek a wife for Isaac.

 

This law-abiding adherence to racial purity by the patriarchs can also be seen in Jacob when Isaac instructed him in Genesis 28:1,6 and 8 not to marry any Canaanite daughters. 

 

Ruth:

In Numbers 32:33 and Joshua 13:24:32 the land to the east of the Jordan was given to two tribes of Israel namely the Gadites and the Reubenites and the half tribe of Manasseh.  On any reputable Bible map of those times, this territory was known as the plains of Moab.

 

1 Chronicles 4:22 states that certain Judean families ruled Moab:

22      And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubi-lehem. And these are ancient things.

This last sentence is of particular significance.  In this same country of Moab (Ruth 1:1), Elimelech and his wife Naomi together with his two sons would have made contact with the two and a half tribes of Israel that settled in this territory or with the families of Judea that ruled over Moab. Elimelech and Naomi’s sons, Mahlon and Chilion could thus take wives from the Israel tribes that lived in the plains of Moab.

 

It is thus obvious that when Ruth arrived with Naomi in Judea, she was called a Moabitess, because she came from the Moab.  As mentioned, this was customary of those times.  Ruth also told Naomi in Ruth 1:16:

            “- - - - - thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God:”

 

Now we will look at Boaz:

An in-depth study of his conduct confirmed that he was an honourable and devoted man living strictly according to the Law of God.  Even when Ruth stood at the foot of his bed that first night and requested that he spread the corner of his garment over her, he told her that he will comply with her wishes but he knows of another redeemer that is a closer relation to Ruth’s deceased husband and that he must grant him the first opportunity to exercise his redemption right.  (According to the Law, Boaz, as the nearest redeemer, must have sexual intercourse with her – spread the corner of his garment over her - to sire her children on behalf of her deceased husband)  - Ruth 3 refers.

 

According to Ruth 4, the closer redeemer did not exercise his redemption right and Boaz took Ruth as his wife.  They sired Obed, the father of Jesse who was the father of David out of whose bloodline our Lord Jesus Christ was born.

 

In Deuteronomy 23:3 we read that, no Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the LORD even down to the tenth generation, in other words, never!  We have also seen as to what lengths Abraham, Isaac and Jacob went to keep their bloodlines pure.  On numerous occasions in the Old Testament, the LORD commanded Israel against intermarriages with other nations.

 

I will elaborate on the following but just think how fiercely angry the LORD must have been with Israel when they began intermarrying with the Moabites after Balaam advised Balak to invite the Israelites to their feasts. (Numbers 25:1-3; Numbers 31:16).

Also read Deuteronomy 7:6-8.

6          For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

7          The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:

8          But because the LORD loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.”

These are eternal truths. 

 

Let us thus pay particular attention:

Would Boaz, an honourable and devoted man proven through Ruth, have broken the Law of God, which ordained that the blood of Israel be kept pure?  Would he have broken the Law at this very important juncture in history?  Did Boaz forget how God punished Israel when they followed Balaam’s advice to intermarry with the Moabites?

It is inconceivable.

Would the Bible that is so accurate and precise, that described in detail how Boaz handled the redemption rights issue with Ruth, (the redemption right was one of God’s decrees given to Israel as an ordinance), now provide this detail and to this extent, in vain?

 

Would God, who promised that the Messiah will be born out of Judea, allow Jesus’ ancestors to be half heathen (if Ruth was a true Moabite as alleged) and half Israelite (through Boaz)?  It is in direct contradiction to the Gospel of the Old Testament.

Moses wife:

Now we will consider Moses and his “Cushite” wife.  Firstly, we need to understand that nations in Biblical times lived in different countries than today, due to mass migration.  For example, the Egyptians of today are not the same Egyptians as in the days of Joseph buy kamagra uk.  Also, in Moses’ day, there were two countries of Cush (or Ethiopia), one in Asia and one in Africa.

 

In order for justice to prevail in our investigation of Moses’ wife, we need to understand who this man Moses really was, as well as his wife.

 

Let us start with Moses: 

We read in Numbers 12: 6-8.

6        And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the LORD will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.

7       My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.


8        With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?”

 

Moses was the man with whom God spoke face to face.  He was without doubt a type of Christ.  He already knew God’s voice in Egypt and His Redemption Plan in Jesus Christ.

Let us study the following scripture: Hebrews 11:24-27:

24         By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter;

25         Choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season;

26         Esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward.

27         By faith he forsook Egypt, not fearing the wrath of the king: for he endured, as seeing him who is invisible.”

 

Moses also told Israel about Christ:

Deut. 18:15.

“- - - - - - a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken”

 

Please read Hebrews 11:18; John 1:21, 25, 45; Acts 3:22; Acts 7:37.

 

Moses was also the man through whom God made his laws known to Israel, including the law against intermarriages.  Can you imagine that this man, who stood face to face in God’s presence and spoke to him directly, would disobey one of God’s most important laws that of the mixing of blood?  If he was that way inclined, he could have taken an Egyptian woman.  As it stands, he regarded the reproach of Christ higher than all the riches of Egypt.

 

Moses’ father-in-law:

His name was Reuel in Exodus 2:18;

And Jethro in Exodus 3:1;

In Exodus 2:16 he is mentioned as the priest of Midian.

Midian was a descendant of Abraham through Keturah, the woman he married after the death of Sarah.

Please read Genesis 25:1-2.

It is generally accepted that Keturah was coloured although there are no facts to substantiate this claim.  Abraham, the faithful hero and friend of God, listened to God’s voice and obeyed all his ordinances, commands, decrees and laws - (Genesis 26:5).  Would Abraham, so adamant that his son Isaac obey God’s decree regarding the mixing of blood, disregard God’s laws on segregation himself? Would it not be more reasonable and Scriptural to rather believe that Keturah was a Hebrew or at least a Shemite?

 

In Genesis 9:26 Noah said that God will be called the God of Shem.  He did not say that God will be called the God of Japheth or Ham.  Those that serve the LORD would thus have come from Shem and Reuel was “the priest of Midian” - (Exodus 2:16).

 

The name Reuel means “friend of God”, a true worshipper of the Living God.  Some theologies consider that he would have been of similar caliber as Job and Melchizedek.  It is confirmed in Exodus 18 where Jethro (or Reuel) visited Moses at the mountain of God where Israel camped.  Jethro rejoiced when he heard what the LORD did for Israel and that He saved Israel from Pharaoh and the Egyptians - (Exodus 18:8).

In Exodus 18:12 we read:

12         And Jethro, Moses’ father in law, took a burnt-offering and sacrifices for God: and Aaron came, and all the elders of Israel, to eat bread with Moses’ father in law before God.

 

From this passage, it is clear that Jethro was not a heathen.  If his daughter, Zipporah, was black, as alleged because she is called a Cushite, Jethro must then also have been black and thus a heathen.  No heathen nation knew the God of Israel during those times.  This man not only knew the God of Israel but he was a Priest of God and sacrificed to Him as well.  He also ate bread before God with Aaron, the High Priest and the elders of Israel.

 

Further on in Exodus 18 we read that Jethro gave Moses sound advice on the delegation of Israel’s administration to lighten the burden on Moses:

Exodus 18:21-22:

21         Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens:

22         And let them judge the people at all seasons: and it shall be, that every great matter they shall bring unto thee, but every small matter they shall judge: so shall it be easier for thyself, and they shall bear the burden with thee.

 

Moses listened to his father in law’s advice and made the appointments.

 

You can thus appreciate that Zipporah was not a Cushite in the sense that she was not a heathen or of mixed blood. 

It is a terrible misconception, with far reaching implications, to ask us to read Numbers 12, with the purpose of using this chapter to promote scripture as saying that there is nothing wrong with Caucasians marrying across the colour line.  

 

Segregation:

In these times especially, it is an unforgivable deception to use such names as Ruth and Moses Cushite wife to coerce us into a state of mind where we have to accept the equality of races and intermarriages based on these Scriptures.

 

History has proven that there is no equality of races and we cannot change in the next few years what could not be changed in thousands of years before.  This modern day fallacy in both politics and religion is the deception that our Lord Jesus warned us against and which shall come to pass before his return. 

Read: Matthew 24:4-5, 11, 24.

 

This deception forms part of the satanic assault against the White Protestant Nation to dispossess them of their identity.  In my books “The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel” and “Apartheid: What saith the Scripture?” it is proven with Scripture that the Western White Protestant Nations and their descendants are the lineal progeny of the ten lost tribes of Israel.

 

The following scriptures in the Bible prove how important it was to God that His people’s blood must remain pure:

Exodus 19:5-6; Deuteronomy 7:6-8, 32:8-9; Ezra 9:1-4, 11-13; Nehemiah 9:1-3,7, 13-14, 10:30, 13:3, 23-31. 

(The word “holy’ means “separate”).  Elaboration on these scriptures can be found in both of the above-mentioned books.

 

White Leadership:

If we read the Bible correctly, we will understand that God, under Him, destined this nation and its descendants to be leaders of the world’s nations, which will be to their best interest and preservation.  When we look at the past (up to 1945), we see that where Whites lead the world, order reigned and there was enough food for the non-whites under their leadership.

 

After 1945 when the Whites withdrew from these territories, famine, tyranny, and oppression followed.  Communism striving towards world domination propagates this equalisation ideology aggressively.  Satan, their inspiration, knows that when the White Protestant Nations are eliminated or neutralised through miscegenation, they will be easily overpowered, dominated and enslaved.

 

It is thus with extreme distress that I listen to our leaders’ dictums that propagate: “If the Afrikaner wants to survive, he will have to adopt a political style that will enable him to enter into dialogue with other population groups, not to decide on their behalf but to jointly decide on the future of South Africa” - (Dr. Gerrit Viljoen in front of the Rapportryerskorps in Pretoria, DIE BEELD 26 September 1979). 

 

This abdication is a direct result of our lack of knowledge regarding the Scripture and our unconverted state as a Nation.  There is only one solution and it is to be reborn unto God as a nation and the rediscovery of our own identity.

Daily Quotes

Joh 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

MiniCalendar

March 2016
MTWTFSS
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031

Vinaora Visitors Counter

132603
This_MonthThis_Month1634
All daysAll days132603